DR. GRAHAM BEYNON ON BAPTISTS HISTORY IN ENGLAND
The following is my summary of Graham Beynon's research into early Baptist history in England.
According
to Graham Beynon, an English pastor, leader in the Fellowship
Independent Evangelical Churches, professor at Oak Hill Seminary,
London, with a PhD from St Andrew's University. Below is a summary of his writings on Baptist history in England in the 17th century. You can read his full article here .
1) In 1626 there were 150 General Baptists "0" Particular Baptists.
Obviously the Generals were more numerous. So how "early" do you
consider early Baptists?
2) Particular Baptists first appeared in 1633.
3) From
1640 to 1660 many Baptists accepted preaching positions in the Anglican
Church. (Seems strange to me, but ok) did they baptize those in the
Anglican Church??
4) By 1660 there were 130
Particular Baptist churches and 110 General baptist churches. The
Generals tended to have a larger congregations tho, so numerically, it
is still very possible that the Generals outnumbered Particulars.
5) The
Act of Uniformity resulted in the Great Ejection from the state
church, mainly comprising Presbyterians. Many of the ejected ministers
(Presbyterians) joined the
Baptist camp. (Did this affect Particular Baptist theology??? Is this
one reason why the London Confession so closely follows the
Westminster?)
6) Beynon says "In
particular it showed movement away from some traditional Anabaptist
positions and towards that of Presbyterian and Congregational polity"
What Anabaptist positions did the Particular Baptists hold? Anabaptists were
totally Arminian.
7) Both
groups of Baptists declined about the same time, with the Generals
refuting heresy at their General Assembly, but allowing the heretics to
remain among them, and the Particulars becoming hyper Calvinists,
antinomian etc with the conclusion that evangelization was useless. One example is given by Hoad who speaks of a pastor who was “so afraid
of Arminianism and Pelagianism that he made no attempt to awaken the
consciences of the unconverted lest he should despoil God of the sole
glory of their conversion.” C. H. Spurgeon later commented that such theology had “chilled many churches to their soul."
"New life breathed into the General Baptist movement by the creation of
the New Connexion of General Baptists. This was initiated by Dan
Taylor who led a congregation at Wadsworth and cultivated close
relationships with a group of independent Baptists in Leicestershire,
who had also been affected by the revival. Having become disillusioned
with the state of the General Baptists, Taylor moved to unite the
Leicestershire group with his church and any other General Baptist
churches that remained orthodox. As a result the New Connexion of
General Baptists came into being in 1770. Underwood states: “ It was
obviously a child of the Methodist Revival, and manifested two Methodist
characteristics: strong evangelistic zeal and strong corporate
feeling."
"Many of the Particular Baptists effectively sat out of the
revival, being especially skeptical of Wesley due to his Arminianism.
They thought better of Whitefield but were wary of his “Arminian
dialect” and “semi-Pelagian address” Despite this frosty reception Whitefield was invited to speak at a
number of Particular Baptist churches and saw enthusiastic responses
to his message".
I
dont know much about Professor Beynon, but if his facts and statements
are true, I am not at all sure it can be discerned which group of
Baptists were more numerous. The last quotes brings us to 1770, just past the time my research begins. If Calvinists called Whitefield "Arminian"
and "semi pelagian" it is obvious that most of them had ceased any
efforts at evangelization.. Of course Whitefield was a card carrying
Calvinist. Cant imagine what they wouldve called Spurgeon!
Comments
Post a Comment